Information storage

Within the public consciousness, the neural network  is considered the seat of consciousness and all memories of a human individual.

Storage of all knowledge

We humans have the feeling to be able to understand everything when we get an explanation adapted to our present knowledge. An entity that potentially can understand everything and can remember everything, may have no memory whose internal structure favorizes certain knowledge.

• It must be open to everything imaginable.
• Its internal structures must not favor certain findings.
• However, new findings are usually build on existing knowledge, this must be taken into account.
• Therefore, our memory is based especially on the very first findings that we have made in our early childhood.
• The very first findings have therefore always something to do with the knowledge on the signal processing of our body.
• The storage mechanism must be fast, so that we also remember the events that we have experienced 1 minute or 2 seconds ago.
• If we can keep only 7 meanings simultaneously in our main memory (consciousness), then it makes sense if the structures of our external memory take this into account.

Open to all is something continuous, something infinitely fine, just something infinite. This can be only  a spiritual entity, because everything material has structure, all material is finite.

Our brain has a great ability to adapt to new knowledge and experiences. Before it can be stored in the brain, a superior instance must have recognized the new experience and evaluated it in order to allow also the adaptation of the evaluation that enables later re-assessment of already experienced.

The understanding instance is our understanding mind. I call this instance ExperienceEntity.

Structural adjustment

Science believes that the information is encoded in the mode of linkage of the neurons. Another idea is not feasible with the dogma of the materialists. The possibilities for adapting the structures of neurons braid in living organisms were detected by science.

This kind of adaptation takes time. The neurogenesis takes 4 weeks. Afterwards any difference between the new neuron and an adjacent neuron can no longer be seen. The integration of new neurons takes weeks and stamping out new dendrites with synapses takes hours.

The more often a neuron A is simultaneous active with neuron B, the more preferable the two neurons will react to each other, What fires together, connects.

Recent experiences can not be saved with this setup. We remember very recent ecperiences. It would have to be stored meanwhile somewhere in a faster storage. Where should that be?

However, we also see the effect that new acquired knowledge is much more stable after a few weeks, even though we have not thought about it. We then have easier, faster access to that new knowledge.

The neuron structure was probably optimized during this time to that new knowledge. But where was the knowledge stored before?

Theory of Being

It is much more likely that new experiences and new knowledge is done by adjusting the internal logic of the nerve cells. The change in internal logic can happen instantaneously, assuming that each cell has its own consciousness and that their memory is not limited to 7 meanings.

The new internal logic thus changing the decisions of the cell, which signals are on which Dendrite forwarded to reflect new knowledge.

I go here on the assumption that each neuron is responsible for a particular complex of a single Ur-idea, though each nerve cell has the potential to be in charge of all the Ur-ideas.

Being responsible does not mean that the other neurons can not know anything about the other Ur- ideas.

The diversification of the individual nerve cell leads to the result that an individual nervecell is responsible only for a subset of an Ur- idea. This may find its reasons in the pursuit of safety, durability, speed and reliability.

For this reason, the functions of damaged areas in the brain can be taken by other neurons in the brain over the long term.

Signals

An open science would reckon with the possibility that in the synapses are transferred not only dead molecules. What if every molecule of this neurotransmitter is also an information packages that  neurons communicate with each other?

We live in a vast universe of spiritual beings, all interact with each other in various ways which always is only communication. We still have a long way to go, to understand the world or at least to understand ourselves.