My Problem

I am absolutely sure that I have an awareness, that I am a spiritual being. I am absolutely certain that I, that my mind exists. For me, mind and consciousness is one and the same.

I can not say with the same absolute certainty, that my body really exists the way, I experience it. This is the same with all other material objects I experience in my mind.

It could also be true, that I only experience the idea of ​​matter in my spiritual mind. I experience in my mind only the ideas which are represented or shown by other individual minds which all are spiritual entities.

These other spiritual entities can exist as real, as well as my mind really exists. It could be that those spiritual beings bear in their minds those ideas which I perceive.

All spiritual beings only perceive the consciousness content of other spiritual beings who want to represent this. The ideas of matter in the consciousness of matter-entities provide other spiritual entities with the reality of the material world.

My body then consists of a variety and multiplicity of spiritual beings with their spiritual ideas, which are interwoven into a whole package of ideas which realize the functions of my body as I experience it.

I am the spiritual entity that is entangled with my spiritual body. My ego spiritual entity is capable of controlling the external activities of my spiritual body.

The Problem

The real problem of our time is that scientists and the so-called public opinion has subordinated to the matter dogma. No scientist, no science journalist dares to attack this matter dogma.

Although scientists are not in a position to explain their own consciousness, their own mind with the help of their own ideas about the properties of matter. But they insist further on the matter dogma, as if their salvation would depend on it.

The inability of our scientific management staff, seriously seeking for other models to explain the scientific facts. The reason might be, that the scientific community is highly dependent on the monetary interests of individuals and large international business organizations.

Their economic benefice could potentially be compromised if too many people would change their attitudes to life by other theoretical models.

The fact that religious organizations still have too much influence on the behavior of too many people in the general public also prevents a rational discussion about the reality of being.

Too deep seated fear of punishment by the god of the great church organizations. Their exercise of power has this fear implanted in the public and cultural consciousness of the various human communities.

This God is dominated by the church organizations. Deviants from their dogma are still punished, at least with exclusion.

The Mind-Body-Problem

The mind-body problem of philosophy has been around for many, many years. There is clear evidence of the inadequacy of the prevailing theory about the reality of being that wants to explain everything that happens in the universe with the properties of matter.

(see Wikipedia: Mind-Body-Problem)

Our human consciousness has not yet been found in our brain. The fact that we can understand, that we have feelings and we may want to, could not be explained so far with the rules of physics. But all people are sure that they have an awareness, that they can understand things, that they have feelings and that they want to be able to do things.

Strangely, even the materialists, who believe in the matter as a source of all being, are convinced that they have an awareness. Fear these people the existence of a Great Spirit?

Thinking models?

The Thinking humanity can be divided roughly into two faiths or ideologies who prefer different mental models to explain the reality of being. One group I call the materialists and the other group are the spiritualists. In practice, of course there are all sorts of hybrid forms in between.

I am convinced that only that conceptual model of reality comes close to reality, which can explain all the phenomena of human existence in a plausible theory including all scientific facts and all my spiritual experiences..

I agree here with the philosopher Karl R. Popper: “What interests me are the objective critical reasoning, which suggests that a theory is preferable to another in the search for truth.

How will this new model of thinking look like?